|THE SAINT PAUL PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEY|
WORKERS COMPENSATION - summary affirmance. -- out of & in course of - intoxicated passenger, driverSTATE OF MINNESOTA
IN SUPREME COURT
Charles Ball, by Diana Mancino,
Pear One, Inc./Craig Rebers, and
Special Compensation Fund.
Considered and decided by the court en banc.
O R D E R
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 18, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that, “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). We further conclude that relator has not overcome the presumption that Minn. Stat. § 176.183 (2004) is constitutional.
Respondent is awarded ,200 in attorney fees.
Dated: January 24, 2007
BY THE COURT:
Lorie S. Gildea
| By visiting this page or clicking the
"submit" button above, you agree
that you have read and accept this "disclaimer".
Michael E. Douglas, Attorney at Law, Saint Paul MN. All Rights
Minnesota Lawyer representing Personal Injury, Car / Auto Accident, Workers Compensation, Medical Malpractice, Social Security Disability claims.
Dedicated to Injured Workers, Victims of Negligence, Car Accidents, Victims of Fraud, and those in need of legal assistance.