MINNEAPOLIS PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEY  
attorney Michael E. Douglas Attorney at Law
  Personal Injury Attorney
  St. Paul Workers Compensation Lawyer work comp attorney
 > About Me
   :: My Commitment
   :: Our Community
   
 > Legal Practice Areas
  twin cities comsumer lawPersonal Injury
   :: Traffic Accidents
   :: Medical Malpractice
   :: Social Security Disability
   :: Premises Liability
   :: Wrongful Death
   :: Dog Bite
   :: Back/Spinal/Neck Injuries
   :: Whiplash
   :: Defective Medical Devices
   :: Defective Drugs
  Minnesota Personal InjuryWorkers Compensation
  St. Paul personal injuryConsumer Law
   :: Debt Collection
   :: Repossessions
   :: Foreclosures
   :: Loan, Credit, Banking
   :: Arbitration Agreements
   :: Deception and Fraud
   :: Auto Fraud / Lemon Law
   :: Warranties
   :: Predatory Lending
   
 > Contact Us
   :: Contact Us
 

Law Offices of Michael E. Douglas
P.O. Box 251551
Woodbury, Minnesota 55125-6551
   

 Saint Paul Lawyer
 
 mdouglas@injurylawtwincities.com

 

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Willie Herman Davis: ETHICS - 6-month suspension stayed on conditions, 7-year probation after felony DWI

1
STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN SUPREME COURT
A07-1855
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against
Willie Herman Davis, a Minnesota Attorney,
Registration No. 298384.
O R D E R
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a
petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Willie Herman Davis committed
professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, felony driving while
impaired, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b).
Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Responsibility,
waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional
Responsibility, and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly
recommend that the appropriate discipline is a 6-month suspension from the practice of
law and seven years of unsupervised probation. The parties recommend that
respondents suspension be stayed on condition that respondent not engage in similar
misconduct and abide by the terms of his probation.
The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly
recommended disposition.
Based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Willie Herman Davis is suspended
from the practice of law for six months and is placed on unsupervised probation for a
period of seven years. Respondents suspension is stayed subject to the following
conditions:
a. Respondent shall cooperate fully with the Directors Office in its
efforts to monitor compliance with his probation and shall promptly
respond to the Directors correspondence by the due date. Respondent shall
cooperate with the Directors investigation of any allegations of
unprofessional conduct that may come to the Directors attention. Upon the
Directors request, respondent shall provide authorization for release of
information and documentation to verify compliance with the terms of this
probation.
b. Respondent shall abide by the Minnesota Rules of Professional
Conduct.
c. Respondent shall comply with the terms of his criminal probation.
d. Respondent shall provide the Director with authorizations to monitor
and receive reports regarding his compliance with his criminal probation,
including biological fluid testing and home monitoring. Any positive read
for ingested alcohol or mood-altering chemicals that are not prescribed by a
physician or dentist will be grounds for revoking the stay of respondents
suspension from the practice of law.
e. Respondent shall, at his own expense, no more than four times per
month, submit to random urinalysis for drug screening at a facility
approved by the Director. These drug screenings shall be in addition to any
screenings required by respondents criminal probation. Respondent shall
direct the drug screening facility to provide the results of all urinalysis
testing to the Directors Office. If, after six months, all such tests have
been negative, then the frequency of the random tests may be reduced or
terminated at the Directors discretion. Respondent shall cooperate with
the phone-in program established by the Director for the random tests. Any
failure to phone-in in accordance with the random test program shall be
considered the same as a positive test result. Any positive test shall be
grounds for revoking the stay of respondents suspension from the practice
of law.
3
f. Respondent shall, by the tenth day of each month, without a specific
reminder or request, submit to the Director an attendance verification for
Alcoholics Anonymous, or any other treatment program required under the
terms of respondents criminal probation, on a form supplied by the
Director that provides the name, address, and telephone number of the
person personally verifying respondents attendance.
g. Should respondent be discharged from his criminal probation before
the seven year period imposed in the district courts February 28, 2007,
sentencing order, the Director may in his discretion reduce the duration of
respondents disciplinary probation in accordance with respondents
discharge by community corrections.
Respondent shall pay 0 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.
Dated: October 17, 2007
BY THE COURT:
/s/
Helen M. Meyer
Associate Justice
 

 
 
 

  What day were you injured?

  / /


  What caused your injuries?
Traffic/Bicycle Accident
Work-Related Injury
Wrongful Death
Dog Bite
Slip and Fall
Other:


  How have your injuries affected

  your life?

 


  What kinds of medical care
  professionals have you seen?

 


  What has your treatment cost?

 

  Is Insurance Involved?
My insurance may cover
        this.

Someone else's insurance
        may cover this.

I already filed a claim.
I rejected a settlement
        offer.

I accepted a settlement
        offer.

  Were there any witnesses?
Bystanders Witnessed This.
Police Responded and Filed
        a Police Report

Police Responded but Did
        Not File a Police Report


 

 

          By visiting this page or clicking the
  "submit" button above, you agree
  that you have read and accept this   "disclaimer".
 
Copyright © Michael E. Douglas, Attorney at Law, Saint Paul MN. All Rights Reserved.
Minnesota Law Firm representing Personal Injury, Car / Auto Accident, Workers Compensation, Medical Malpractice, Social Security Disability claims.
Dedicated to Injured Workers, Victims of Negligence, Car Accidents, Victims of Fraud, and those in need of legal assistance.