| MINNEAPOLIS PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEY |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
UNPUBLISHED CIVIL OPINIONS FROM THE MINNESOTA COURT OF APPEALSA07-1890In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. P. B., III, and J. A. B.-T., Parents KLAPHAKE, Judge On August 31, 2007, the district court terminated the parental rights of appellant J. A. B.-T to her two children, H.B., born August 4, 1992, and C.B., born January 31, 1998. The district court's termination order relied on four statutory bases: abandonment, failure to comply with parental duties, failure to contribute to the children's financial support, and palpable unfitness, all in violation of Minn. Stat. ? 260C.301, subd. 1(b) (1)-(4) (2006). The court also found that termination is in the children's best interests. Because the record provides clear and convincing evidence that appellant abandoned the children and that termination is in their best interests, we affirm. = = = = A07-1694 In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M.T. and E.T., Sr., Parents. CRIPPEN, Judge Appellants challenge the findings of fact leading to the termination of the mother's parental rights for four children. Because the findings are adequately supported by the evidence, we affirm. = = = = A07-0866 Randy Allen Polzin, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. SCHELLHAS, Judge Appellant challenges a district court order sustaining the revocation of his driving privileges under the implied-consent statute, Minn. Stat. ? 169A.52, subd. 4 (2006). Appellant argues that his right to counsel was not vindicated. Because we find that appellant was given a reasonable amount of time to contact an attorney of his own choosing, we affirm. = = = = A07-0734 A07-0735 Muyuka Mutanga, Relator, vs. Commissioner of Human Services, Respondent (A07-734), KALITOWSKI, Judge Relator Muyuka Mutanga challenges refusals by the Department of Human Services (DHS) and the Department of Health (MDH) to set aside his disqualification from working in any position allowing direct contact with individuals receiving services from certain state-licensed facilities. Relator argues that the record does not support the commissioners' determinations that he poses a risk of harm to persons served by the licensed entities. We affirm. = = = = A06-2410 William E. Schocker, Appellant, vs. John R. Schocker, Respondent, Deanna Y. Schocker, Respondent. KALITOWSKI, Judge Appellant William E. Schocker challenges the district court's ,500 damage award in favor of respondents John R. Schocker and Deanna Y. Schocker, appellant's nephew and his wife. Specifically, appellant argues that the district court's finding that appellant exceeded the scope of his easement over respondents' land, thereby causing damage to the road, was not supported by the record. We affirm. = = = = A06-1338 David Michael Turner, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. KALITOWSKI, Judge Appellant David Michael Turner challenges the district court judgment sustaining his driver's license revocation pursuant to the implied-consent law, arguing that his due process rights were violated. We affirm. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| By visiting this page or clicking the "submit" button above, you agree that you have read and accept this "disclaimer". |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright ©
Michael E. Douglas, Attorney at Law, Saint Paul MN. All Rights
Reserved. Minnesota Law Firm representing Personal Injury, Car / Auto Accident, Workers Compensation, Medical Malpractice, Social Security Disability claims. Dedicated to Injured Workers, Victims of Negligence, Car Accidents, Victims of Fraud, and those in need of legal assistance. |
