Lehto v. Community Memorial Hospital: WORKERS COMPENSATION - summary affirmance - medical treatment, expense St. Paul Lawyer Michael E. Douglas Minnesota Injury Lawyers - Personal Injury Attorneys in Minneapolis, Bloomington and Brooklyn Park
  MINNEAPOLIS PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEY  
attorney Michael E. Douglas Attorney at Law
  Personal Injury Attorney
   St. Paul Workers Compensation Lawyer work comp attorney
 > About Me
   :: My Commitment
   :: Our Community
   
 > Legal Practice Areas
  twin cities comsumer lawPersonal Injury
   :: Traffic Accidents
   :: Medical Malpractice
   :: Social Security Disability
   :: Premises Liability
   :: Wrongful Death
   :: Dog Bite
   :: Back/Spinal/Neck Injuries
   :: Whiplash
   :: Defective Medical Devices
   :: Defective Drugs
  Minnesota Personal InjuryWorkers Compensation
  St. Paul personal injuryConsumer Law
   :: Debt Collection
   :: Repossessions
   :: Foreclosures
   :: Loan, Credit, Banking
   :: Arbitration Agreements
   :: Deception and Fraud
   :: Auto Fraud / Lemon Law
   :: Warranties
   :: Predatory Lending
   
 > Contact Us
   :: Contact Us
 
 

 

Lehto v. Community Memorial Hospital: WORKERS COMPENSATION - summary affirmance - medical treatment, expense

STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN SUPREME COURT
A08-379


Robin Lehto,

Respondent,

vs.

Community Memorial Hospital, and
Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance/Cambridge
Integreted Services,

Relators,

Lakewalk Surgery Center,

Respondent,

and

Edward A. Spawn,

Respondent,

vs.

National Steel Pellet Company, Self-Insured
Security Fund/Sedgewick James,

Relators,

Lakewalk Surgery Center,

Respondent,
and

 
Connie M. Stemper,

Respondent,

vs.

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and
Sedgewick Claims/CNA,

Relators,

Lakewalk Surgery Center,

Respondent.


Considered and decided by the court en banc.
O R D E R
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 30, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Dated: June 25, 2008
BY THE COURT:



/s/

Lorie S. Gildea
Associate Justice

  

 
 
 

  What day were you injured?

  / /


  What caused your injuries?
 Traffic/Bicycle Accident
Work-Related Injury
Wrongful Death
Dog Bite
Slip and Fall
Other:


  How have your injuries affected
  your life?
 


  What kinds of medical care
  professionals have you seen?
 


  What has your treatment cost?
 

  Is Insurance Involved?
My insurance may cover
        this.
Someone else's insurance
        may cover this.
I already filed a claim.
I rejected a settlement
        offer.
I accepted a settlement
        offer.

  Were there any witnesses?
Bystanders Witnessed This.
Police Responded and Filed
        a Police Report
Police Responded but Did
        Not File a Police Report

 

 
          By visiting this page or clicking the
  "submit" button above, you agree
  that you have read and accept this   "disclaimer".
 
Copyright © Michael E. Douglas, Attorney at Law, Saint Paul MN. All Rights Reserved.
Minnesota Law Firm representing Personal Injury, Car / Auto Accident, Workers Compensation, Medical Malpractice, Social Security Disability claims.
Dedicated to Injured Workers, Victims of Negligence, Car Accidents, Victims of Fraud, and those in need of legal assistance.