Garrett M. Marshall, Employee, vs. Steinbrecher Painting, Inc.: WORKERS' COMPENSATION - Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals decision affirmed without opinion; penalties Question below St. Paul Lawyer Michael E. Douglas Minnesota Injury Lawyers - Personal Injury Attorneys in Minneapolis, Bloomington and Brooklyn Park
  MINNEAPOLIS PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEY  
attorney Michael E. Douglas Attorney at Law
  Personal Injury Attorney
   St. Paul Workers Compensation Lawyer work comp attorney
 > About Me
   :: My Commitment
   :: Our Community
   
 > Legal Practice Areas
  twin cities comsumer lawPersonal Injury
   :: Traffic Accidents
   :: Medical Malpractice
   :: Social Security Disability
   :: Premises Liability
   :: Wrongful Death
   :: Dog Bite
   :: Back/Spinal/Neck Injuries
   :: Whiplash
   :: Defective Medical Devices
   :: Defective Drugs
  Minnesota Personal InjuryWorkers Compensation
  St. Paul personal injuryConsumer Law
   :: Debt Collection
   :: Repossessions
   :: Foreclosures
   :: Loan, Credit, Banking
   :: Arbitration Agreements
   :: Deception and Fraud
   :: Auto Fraud / Lemon Law
   :: Warranties
   :: Predatory Lending
   
 > Contact Us
   :: Contact Us
 
 

 

Garrett M. Marshall, Employee, vs. Steinbrecher Painting, Inc.: WORKERS' COMPENSATION - Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals decision affirmed without opinion; penalties Question below

STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN SUPREME COURT
A08-1673


Garrett M. Marshall,
Employee,

vs.

Steinbrecher Painting, Inc., and
Meadowbrook Claims Services,

Relators,

and

Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry,
Workers’ Compensation Division,

Respondent.


________________________________


T. Michael Kilbury, Peterson, Logren & Kilbury, P.A., St. Paul, Minnesota, for relators.

Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Rory H. Foley, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota, for respondent.

________________________________


Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

 
O R D E R

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 26, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Dated: January 28, 2009


BY THE COURT:



/s/

Eric J. Magnuson
Chief Justice


  

 
 
 

  What day were you injured?

  / /


  What caused your injuries?
 Traffic/Bicycle Accident
Work-Related Injury
Wrongful Death
Dog Bite
Slip and Fall
Other:


  How have your injuries affected
  your life?
 


  What kinds of medical care
  professionals have you seen?
 


  What has your treatment cost?
 

  Is Insurance Involved?
My insurance may cover
        this.
Someone else's insurance
        may cover this.
I already filed a claim.
I rejected a settlement
        offer.
I accepted a settlement
        offer.

  Were there any witnesses?
Bystanders Witnessed This.
Police Responded and Filed
        a Police Report
Police Responded but Did
        Not File a Police Report

 

 
          By visiting this page or clicking the
  "submit" button above, you agree
  that you have read and accept this   "disclaimer".
 
Copyright © Michael E. Douglas, Attorney at Law, Saint Paul MN. All Rights Reserved.
Minnesota Law Firm representing Personal Injury, Car / Auto Accident, Workers Compensation, Medical Malpractice, Social Security Disability claims.
Dedicated to Injured Workers, Victims of Negligence, Car Accidents, Victims of Fraud, and those in need of legal assistance.