|THE SAINT PAUL PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEY|
ETHICS - re-suspension without evidence of Professional Responsibility examSTATE OF MINNESOTA
IN SUPREME COURT
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against
Richard H. Martin, a Minnesota Attorney,
Registration No. 68135.
O R D E R
By order filed on September 14, 2005, this court suspended respondent Richard H. Martin for 30 days, with reinstatement conditioned, among other things, upon respondentís successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination within one year from the date of filing of the order. Although respondent was reinstated to active practice by order filed on December 29, 2005, respondent has not yet provided evidence of his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, as required by the September 14, 2005, order.
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Richard H. Martin is suspended from the practice of law until such time as respondent provides evidence of successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Respondentís suspension shall be effective 14 days from the date of this order. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR) and shall provide written notice of his suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals.
Dated: October 25, 2006
BY THE COURT:
Helen M. Meyer
| By visiting this page or clicking the
"submit" button above, you agree
that you have read and accept this "disclaimer".
Michael E. Douglas, Attorney at Law, Saint Paul MN. All Rights
Minnesota Lawyer representing Personal Injury, Car / Auto Accident, Workers Compensation, Medical Malpractice, Social Security Disability claims.
Dedicated to Injured Workers, Victims of Negligence, Car Accidents, Victims of Fraud, and those in need of legal assistance.